1500字论文

时间：2016-11-08 12:34:10 来源：免费论文网

篇一：1500字政治小论文

自古至今，我们的圣哲们早已知道将“道德”他抬到至高的地位，曾几何时，德字成为评价人的标准，不知何故，随着时代的发展进步，我们却将所谓资本主义社会的素质，诸如自私自利，好逸恶劳，金钱至上．惟我独尊，甚至∶人不为己，天诛地灭，标成信条，反而将祖宗的遗训忘了吗？“文明”才是我国最好的名片！

在公共场合，极有涵养的不再是中国人，被世界公认为有“绅士风度”的是英格兰人，被世人尊为睿智聪明的德意志人，最有公共观念，尊重人权的美利坚人．而中华民族，素有“礼仪之邦”的我们却不知“公德”为何物，光天化日下公然偷盗下水道封盖，砸电话亭，乱扔垃圾，随地吐痰……劣迹斑斑，数不胜数．同为华夏儿女，我们实在不愿被人取笑为素质低或是被贬为意识差．那么，我们该做些什么呢？当又一次见证我国综合国力的机会降临，我们不懈的努力着，时刻准备着握住它的手，“机会只属于有准备的人．”于是2001年7月13日，我国北京申奥成功，那一夜，举国欢腾，那一夜，全国人民都应该肃然起敬，都应该感动地流出热泪．因为它代表的是世界对我们的肯定，是我国进步和发展的有力标志．百年奥运，中华圆梦，从奥林匹亚山到万里长城，那是源自生命最初的梦想！

2003年,8月3日.北京奥运会会徽公布∶中国印·舞动的北京.2005年6月北京奥运会志愿者项目正式启动.志愿者是奥运会真正的形象大使.志愿者标志的意义在于“心心相印的心形,象征心连心,奉献爱心,欢快舞动的人型象征手拉手,微笑服务.”自愿者的微笑成为北京最好的名片.2005年11月11日,北京奥运会吉祥物公布,福娃---五个可爱的亲密好伙伴,唱响“北京欢迎您!”他们的造型融入人鱼,大熊猫,藏铃羊,燕子以及奥林匹亚圣火的形象,把中国与世界连在一起.2006年11月30日,北京体育场“鸟剿”成型.2007年3月27日,北京奥运会倒记时500天.今天,我们以“迎奥运,讲文明,树新风”为口号成为奥运会真正的形象大使,时刻准备着.每个中国人,都希望成为奥运会志愿者.当然,一个口号对于社会中存在的那些不文明行为,也许不可能药到病除.当是,我相信,它就像一盏灯,灯光亮一些,我们身边的黑暗就会少一些.并且我相信,每个人的心灵都像一扇窗,窗户打开,光亮就会进来.我相信,文明就在我们身边,离我们很近,很近,近的触手可及.

有时候,文明离我们只不过是几分钟的距离,耐心等待几分钟,绿灯就会亮起,有时候,文明离我们只不过是几十厘米的长度.别急着随手扔下果皮,几十厘米前也许只是一个垃圾桶;有时候,文明离我们只不过是一张纸的厚度,拿出一张纸巾至少代替了地板上一块“光彩”的痰迹;有时候,文明离我们很近很近.我相信,其实文明就在我们心中.我看到,一贯人走在前面开启一扇弹簧门即将过去的时候,发现有人随后,于是就继续推着们等后面的人,后面的人诚恳的表示谢意;我看到,在公共场合,人们考虑到别人的存在,不再大声喧哗;我看到,许多人见面的时候都会说:“你好!”我看到交管部门已经不容许“灰头土脸”的车上路.尽管你的车很高级,司机也不在轻易按喇叭,我看到……在我们身边在我们心中，在我们的记忆长河里，在我们汨汨的笔端下，有过多少温馨的爱的故事当这些爱的故事如微风，如细雨，吹拂过，滋润过我们的心田，浇灌过我们的灵魂，我们的心田因爱而肥沃，我们的灵魂因爱而饱满时，我们是多么幸福．

我相信，其实文明总在生活中不经意地流露着．电梯里，一个宝宝在妈妈怀里甜甜入睡的时候，你的电话响了，赶紧捂着口低声应答，而后，你和那位妈妈相视而笑．有时候，多一个手势，对别人来说是多一份体谅．当你正打算开动公交车，不远处一位老大爷蹒跚走来，你耐心等待，他

扶着车门上车，你和那位老大爷相视而笑．有时候，多一点耐心的等待对别人来说就是多一份关爱。你撑着伞在街的一侧打车,一位大妈从远方渐渐进入你的视野,她站在街的同侧,没有撑伞的她全身湿漉.你缓缓地把伞撑到了她的头上,你和那位大妈相视而笑.有时候,多一点分享,对别人来说就是多一份温暖.没有嫣然绽开的花蕾,便没有四季宜人的温馨,没有温暖怡人的微笑,便没有美好人生的绚烂.微笑是一种气质,气质得益于修养;微笑是一种境界,境界依靠磨练..想要播洒阳光在别人心里,首先自己心里得阳光四溢,自己的心湖得蓄满爱和温情.

生活就是一方沃土,你播下什么,你就收获什么.播下一种心态,收获一种思想;播下一种思想,收获一种行为;播下一种行为,收获一种习惯,播下一种习惯,收获一种命运.当2007年4月26日,北京奥运会火炬接力传递路线及火炬发布,奥运火炬点燃激情,传递梦想.我相信我们每个人迈出一小步,社会就会迈出一大步.我发现文明是一种力量,就像奥运火炬传递一样,在每个人传递也能汇聚所有人的热情.所有文明的热情.微笑的鼓掌吧,欢迎的掌声,文明的掌声,鼓励的掌声,让世界记住我们的掌声;文明的迈步吧,一小步,一小步,让全世界见证我们共创的一大步.迎奥运,拿出我们最好的名片---微笑着讲文明,树新风.

篇二：中日关系论文1500字左右

论中日关系发展

在21世纪，对世界各国来说，最主要的问题仍然是和平与发展问题。没有和平稳定的国际环境，就谈不上经济的繁荣与发展。中国是世界上最大的发展中国家，日本是亚洲唯一的发达国家，两国承担着维护和平和促进发展的重要责任。中日两国关系如何，不仅对中日两国至关重要，而且对亚太地区乃至世界局势都具有相当重要的影响。

一、70年代以来的中日关系回顾

1972年9月日本首相田中角荣访华，两国签署《中日两国政府联合声明》为标志，中日关系翻开了新的一页。二十六年来，中日两国之间虽出现过冲突，但从总体上看，两国关系还是以友好与合作为主的。1972年，中日邦交正常化；1978年签署《中日和平友好条约》；1982年，中国总理访问日本，提出了发展中日关系“三原则”； 1987年9月日本众参两院通过《进一步增进日中友好关系的决议案》。当然，80年代中日之间也存在摩擦：1982年日本文部省在审定中小学教科书时，把“侵略”改成“进入”，中国政府曾对此提出强烈抗议；1985年8月15日，日本首相其阁僚正式参拜靖国神社，激起了中国人民和亚洲各国人民的强烈不满；1996年，日本自民党还把“实现首相和阁僚正式参拜靖国神社”和“钓鱼岛是日本固有领土”写入该党众议院选举公约。80年代以来，中日之间的摩擦与冲突有所增多，但两国政府为了两国的长远利益，多次表示重视发展中日关系。

二、影响中日关系发展的几个问题

1.历史认识问题是处理中日关系的一个原则性问题。战后日本对历史问题认识的不足, 导致中日政治关系的反复, 不利于今后中日关系的发展。

2. 日本在历史上曾经对台湾实行过近半个世纪的殖民统治，至今仍有着浓重的“台湾情结”。随着世界局势的发展和日美同盟的巩固，日本出于战略现实利益的考虑，对台湾问题越来越关切，台湾问题在中日关系中有日益突出之势。台湾问题成为制约中日关系发展的一个不稳定因素。

3.近几年，在钓鱼岛的归属问题上，中日两国存在争执。去年，两国因钓鱼岛归属问题产生了一定的军事矛盾，双方互不相让，也引起两国以及世界人民的关注。中国境内频繁出现抵制日货的行为，两国关系也仿佛到了冰点。以上三个问题是影响中日关系发展的主要问题。除此之外，还有经贸摩擦问题、经援政治化问题等。这些问题严重影响了中日关系向更高层次发展。要解决好这些问题的关键在日本自身。希望日本政府能够认真总结这方面的经验教训，真正放弃否认和歪曲历史的企图，为中日关系的发展扫清障碍。

三、对中日关系展望

经过多年的冲突与合作的磨合，中日两国都更加清楚地认识到，不论世界怎么变化，无论对方怎么发展，不论彼此间愿不愿意，两国相邻的地理位置是改变不了的；作为亚洲大国，两国对亚洲和平与安全的巨大影响是改变不了的；两国在地区经济中的相互依存关系是改变不了的。正是这些无法改变的客观存在，使两国之间不能不产生相互合作的必要与可能。这种合作是基于理性的而不是感情的，是现实的而不是理想主义的，是彼此需要的而不是一相情愿的。也正因为如

此，这种共同的利益要求总是能够一次次战胜两国关系中出现的不和谐与不愉快，使几乎恶化的两国关系一次次化险为夷。

为了维护长期以来历经艰难形成的中日关系大局，我们应本着“以史为鉴、面向未来”的方针，以国家和民族的根本利益为重，为构筑健康、稳定的中日关系而共同努力。日本是中国的近邻，彼此间有着充分的利益交融，在全球化的时代背景下，这一趋势将进一步发展。友好相处，合作双赢，是符合中日两国根本利益的唯一正确选择。在当前复杂多变的国际形势下，继续本着“以史为鉴、面向未来”的精神，实现中日关系的健康稳定发展，对中日两国都具有重要意义。

我们要以正确和发展的眼光看待日本，忘记怨恨，相互宽容。不要受一些媒体片面报道的影响，盲目爱国，更不要盲目反日，不要总以“历史的眼光”看待今天的日本。历史应该成为我们前进的动力，不应该成为我们前进的阻碍。中日友好关系是长远的，不能因为一时的波动而否定两国长远的友好系。中日也应是友好的、稳定的邻居关系。发展中日友好关系是两国政府和人民的共同事业，任何一方的政府都不应忽视它，更不能破坏它，任何忽视、破坏中日友好的行为归根到底是违背了中日人民的长远利益。

篇三：1500字论文

Abstract

Genetically modified food is a kind of food that people apply modern molecular biotechnology,transfer some biological gene to other species, transform the genetic material of living things. Through the application of biotechnology, a broad and significant increase of food production can be happily seen at global agricultural production. This essay tells readers the basic knowledge of the GMF and discusses the GMF in a critical attitude.The GMF can help to solve the food shortage problem,and it also can create new varieties.While it brings us a lot of benefits,it also leads to many safety problems. Firstly,The potential for GM foods to cause allergic reactions is the most obvious health concern associated with these products.Secondly,although in developed countries like American the law of the GMF is complicated,the new grain law have same more rigorous rules in China and other developing countries.And the GMF still has some safety problems unseen. we argue that the genetically modified technology can bring more advantage and less disadvantage to us if it is used appropriate and planed.However, it is essential to have a critical attitude toward GMF until it is proved that the GMF is no harm to our body.This essay can help readers to know the GMF critically.

Key Words: transgenic technology ;Genetically modified food ;food shortage;safety

Introduction

In biology class in high school,we first got in touch with transgenic,and we approximately learned the basic transgenic technology.It can reform and make the use of the natural lives on the ingredient of them by taking advantage of the research finds in life sciences,and can greatly follow the will of people.In its purest form,the term "biotechnology" refers to the use of living organisms or their products to modify human health and the human environment.Interestingly, we learned the fluorescent mice.What’s more,I can still clearly remember a fantastic ideas,that if we import the chlorophyll gene into the dairy cattle,we might can make the caw in the sun and can get the milk. Of course,that is a nice dream.Now,let’s scientifically learn the genetically modified food. Biotechnology in one form or another has flourished since prehistoric times. When the first human beings realized that they could plant their own crops and breed their own animals, they learned to use biotechnology. The discovery that fruit juices fermented into wine, or that milk could be converted into cheese or yogurt, or that beer could be made by fermenting solutions of malt and hops began the study of biotechnology. When the first bakers found that they could make a soft, spongy bread rather than a firm, thin cracker, they were acting as fledgling biotechnologists.

The first animal breeders, realizing that different physical traits could be either magnified or lost by mating appropriate pairs of animals, engaged in the manipulations of biotechnology.

The GMF can help to solve the food shortage problem,and it also can create new varieties.While it brings us a lot of benefits,it also leads to many safety problems. The potential for GM foods to cause allergic reactions is the most obvious health concern associated with these products,and the GMF still has some safety problems unseen.It is essential to treat the GMF critically for ordinary people.

Advantages

We all know that the food shortage has been a serious problem around the Middle East and many developing contries.The most important reason why We develop the GM is that it can help to solve the food problem.

The most important contribution of the GMF is that it can help to solve the food shortage problems.Since 1983 when the first time human got transgenic tobacco, potato by using recombinant DNA technology,the plant genetic engineering technology in the world has achieved rapid development of transgenic plants for research and development,which has made a series of remarkable progress and has nurtured a number of crops with disease-resistance,insecticide resistance and even an incredible high-yield.with the help of them,we can feed another more than millions of people,According to statistics,up to now ,no less than 1.6 billion people have benefits from biotechnology.in the area,our mother country China has made tremendous contributions to the world's biotechnology.what must be mentioned is BT cotton and hybrid rice of Yuan Longping.

The nutrition implications are also often cited as an obvious benefit for consumers, since the bioengineering could create plants that could produce more nutritious food. An example of one such product is "Golden Rice." This strain of rice contains beta-carotene, a source of vitamin A and iron. Developing countries that rely on rice as their major food source are often are the same countries to suffer from high rates of childhood blindness and maternal anemia. Iron and vitamin

A have been shown to aid in the prevention and treatment of maternal anemia and blindness, so "Golden Rice" might help to reduce the rates of these problems. Commercialize genetically modified crops dates from the year of 1996,including Soybeans, cotton, cereals and oilseed rape.GM crops now occupy 10% of global arable land. In 2010,81% of worldwide soybean, 64% cotton, 29% and 23% of the grain is genetically modified oilseed rape.Totally,29 countries grow GM products all over the world.the top three country with the largest area of cultivation is United

States, Brazil and Argentina.The problem About the safety of GM products has been controversial.Genetically modified food will bring human and animal allergens and toxins of unknown.

Main Concerns

Through the application of biotechnology, a broad and significant increase of food production can be happily seen at global agricultural production. But when we enjoy the enormous benefits of the GM food,a new but alarming problem also came that if these food is safe enough for people?

The potential for GM foods to cause allergic reactions is the most obvious health concern associated with these products. Specific proteins in milk, eggs, wheat, fish, tree nuts, peanuts, soybeans, and shellfish cause over 90% of food allergies. If a protein from one of these food types were to be incorporated into a food that normally would not have this protein, people who are allergic to these proteins could unknowingly consume such a food and suffer allergic reactions. A new report (see article) shows that 25 countries now grow GM crops, with the total area under cultivation now larger than Peru. Three-quarters of the farmland used to grow soya is now sown with a genetically modified variant, and the figures for cotton are not that far behind, thanks to its success in India. China recently gave the safety go-ahead to its first GM rice variety and a new GM maize that should make better pig feed. More and more plants are having their genomes sequenced: a full sequence for maize was published late last year, the soya genome in January. Techniques for altering genomes are moving ahead almost as fast as the genomes themselves are stacking up, and new crops with more than one added trait are coming to market.

It is said that in American, GM food is up to 4000 kinds,and it has been a normal goods in their daily life. However,in China and other developing countries, the new grain law have less rigorous rules.For example,the genetically modified seeds' scientific research,experiments,productions,sales,imports and exports should be followed to the country's laws,and every individual person and unit are not allowed to imply genetically modified technology at principle grain cultivars without authorization.That leads to many safety problems. Such stories of success will strike fear into some hearts, and not only in GM-averse Europe; a GM backlash is under way in India, focused on insect-resistant aubergines. Some of these fears are understandable, but lacking supporting evidence they have never been compelling. On safety, the fear which cuts closest to home, the record continues to look good. Governments need to keep testing and monitoring, but that may be becoming easier. More precise modifications, and better technologies for monitoring stray DNA both within plants and in the environment around them, mean that it is getting easier to be sure that nothing untoward is going on.

Then there is the worry that GM crops are a way for big companies to take over the livelihoods of small farmers and, in the end, a chunk of nature itself. Seen in this light the fact that 90% of the farmers growing GM crops are comparatively poor and in developing countries is sinister, not salutary; given Monsanto’s dominance in America’s soyabean market, it seems to

suggest incipient world domination. It is certainly true that big firms make a lot of money selling GM seeds: the GM seed market was worth $10.5 billion in 2009, and the crops that grew from that seed were worth over $130 billion. But multinationals are not the only game in town. The governments of China (which has increased agricultural research across the board), India and Brazil are also developing new GM crops. In 2009 a GM version of an Indian cotton variety, developed in the public sector, came to market, and a variety engineered by a private Indian firm has been approved for commercialisation. Charities, such as the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, are also funding efforts in various countries to make crops more hardy or nutritious. GM seeds that come from government research bodies, or from local firms, may not arouse quite so much opposition as those from large foreign companies, especially when they provide characteristics that make crops better, not just easier to farm.

There is another worry about GM technology, though, that should be taken seriously. It is that its success and appeal to technophiles may, in the minds of those who pay for agricultural research, crowd out other approaches to improving farming. Because it depends on intellectual property that can be protected, GM is ripe for private investment. There is a lot of other agricultural research that is less amenable to corporate ownership but still needs doing. From soil management to weather forecasts to the preservation, study and use of agricultural biodiversity, there are many ways to improve the agricultural systems on which the world’s food supply depends, and make them more resilient as well as more profitable. A farm is not a just a clever crop: it is an ecosystem managed with intelligence. GM crops have a great role to play in that development, but they are only a part of the whole.

Conclusion

Ordinary people should believe that the genetically modified technology can bring more advantage and less disadvantage to us if it is used appropriate and planed.However,we should have a critical attitude toward it until it is proved that the GMF is no harm to our body.

Reference

[1] December 2005 - Safety of artificial sweetener called into question by MP (Guardian, UK)

[2]Fred Gould:Can Agricultural Biotechnology be Green?

[3]Norman Borlaug:Biotechnology and the Green Revolution

[4] JEFFERY SMITH:65 Health Risks of GM Foods

[5] Conner AJ, Glare TR, Nap JP (January 2003). The release of genetically modified crops into the environment.

[6] Dorsch, J.A; Candas, M; Griko, N.B; Maaty, W.S.A; Midboe, E.G; Vadlamudi, R.K; Bulla Jr, L.A (2002). Cry1A toxins of Bacillus thuringiensis bind specifically to a region adjacent to the membrane-proximal extracellular domain of BT-R1 in Manduca sexta

[7] Nathanael Johnson for Grist. Jul 8, 2013 The genetically modified food debate: Where do we begin?

[8] Hunt, Lesley (2004). "Factors determining the public understanding of GM technologies"

[9] Marlene-Aviva Grunpeter (August 5, 2013). "GMOs, A Global Debate: Israel a Center for Study, Kosher Concerns". Epoch Times. "

[10] Deloitte 2010 Food Survey Genetically Modified Foods retrieved 10 October 2012

[11] "Genetically modified (GM) foods". Food Standards Australia and New Zealand. 4 October 2012. Retrieved 5 November 2012

[12] Philip Case for Farmer's Weekly. October 25, 2013 Scientific consensus on GM crops safety 'overwhelming'

[13] Take the Flour Back Press Release, 27/05/12 European activists link up to draw the line against GM

[14] Amy Harmon, July 27, 2013 A Race to Save the Orange by Altering Its DNA

[15] U.S. Department of Energy Genome Programs (2008). "Genetically Modified Foods and Organisms". Archived from the original on May 5, 2013. Retrieved August 28, 2013.

[16] "Greenpeace activists in costly GM protest". Sydney Morning Herald. 2012-08-02. Retrieved 2013-11-08.

《1500字论文》
由：免费论文网互联网用户整理提供,链接地址：
http://m.csmayi.cn/show/91692.html
转载请保留,谢谢!